Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowfoxV1
mega tits...
|
Who told you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reeg
UGH, whenever I play SSB online, there is this one kid I run into who always camps, and since it's a stock match, he'll just wait for our stock to run down then run in and take us down. Also when we go after him, he's insanely cheap because he spams Kirby moves (back when they were actually deadly)
EDIT: Also, in order to be number one, theoretically you'd have to play the most matches and win. It's not like I could win one match, then stop playing so my win ratio is always 100%. If you don't even play the game because you're doing other stuff, you're rank is going to decline, making you seem worse than you really are
|
I don't think that they need a universal player ladder system, I think they need a letter grade system based on how many of which ranked players they have beaten. This would help out a lot because it takes the competition out of the rankings. You would be able to see how good someone is without needing to deal with people cheating for a higher rank.
They could just dish out a very small number of ranks to have everyone use. They could go Green<Blue<Red<Copper<Silver<Gold<Platinum. They could use F<E<D<C<B<A<S. They could use something like that that lets you go "Wow, that guys is an S and I am an E, maybe he is good at this" without making people worry too much about trying to be at the very top of the rankings.
The only problem I see it posing is when an S guy gets beaten and utterly humiliated by an F. Although I have to say, that would be kind of funny.